Re: Unexpected behaviour of encode()

From: Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Unexpected behaviour of encode()
Date: 2013-03-26 18:36:04
Message-ID: 20130326143604.b43f120ce961684f4a232c8d@potentialtech.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

In response to Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>:

> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > psql -U postgres
> > psql (9.2.3)
> > Type "help" for help.
> >
> > postgres=# select encode('can''t', 'escape');
> > encode
> > --------
> > can't
> > (1 row)
> >
> > I observed the same behaviour on one of our older systems (8.3.11) as well.
> >
> > Am I missing something? I expected "can''t" as the output.
>
> why? that isn't what you passed it. the input string doubled single
> quotes is converted to single single quote per spec. it's 'ghetto
> escaping'.

Not sure what you mean by "ghetto secaping" ... but doubling up a '
is the SQL standard escaping method, AFAIK.

If I just do:
SELECT 'can''t'::text;
I get "can't" which is what I'd expect. I would then expect
encode to escape the ' somehow. Even c-style escaping, like
"can\'t" would have been less surprising to me.

If there's something I'm missing, I'm still missing it.

--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2013-03-26 18:41:55 Re: Unexpected behaviour of encode()
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2013-03-26 18:28:54 Re: pg_stat_get_last_vacuum_time(): why non-FULL?