From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Let's invent a function to report lock-wait-blocking PIDs |
Date: | 2013-03-25 15:30:39 |
Message-ID: | 20130325153039.GD3699@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Smith wrote:
> Note that an EXPLAIN based approach doesn't solve all the problems
> in this area, because the trickiest ones I run into are ALTER TABLE
> changes--which you can't EXPLAIN. Some API that dumps the locks an
> arbitrary statement acquired just before it exits would be ideal.
> When a user can ask "what locks did an ALTER TABLE adding a foreign
> key take and what order were they grabbed in?", that would solve the
> hardest of the questions I see in the field.
Hm, this sounds like something we could apply to event triggers -- at
ddl_command_end, you would run a SRF, say
pg_event_trigger_acquired_locks() to get what you want.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2013-03-25 15:48:17 | Re: pg_dump selectively ignores extension configuration tables |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-03-25 15:17:35 | Re: pg_dump selectively ignores extension configuration tables |