| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com> |
| Cc: | 'Greg Smith' <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, 'Robert Haas' <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, 'Greg Stark' <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, 'Andres Freund' <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, 'Boszormenyi Zoltan' <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review] |
| Date: | 2013-03-22 14:02:45 |
| Message-ID: | 20130322140245.GA3701@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Amit Kapila escribió:
> On Friday, March 22, 2013 8:57 AM Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Amit Kapila escribió:
> > > I think adding new syntax change is little scary for me, not for
> > > the matter of implementation but for building consensus on syntax.
> >
> > I cannot but agree on that point.
>
> Sorry, I don't get your point.
> Do you mean to say that you don't agree with me and want new syntax as
> proposed by you to be implemented?
On the contrary, I was saying I agree with you on the difficulty on
getting consensus on this.
I don't know where I learned this phrase or even if it's in common
usage. After a not-so-quick search I see it explained here:
http://www.perfectyourenglish.com/usage/but.htm
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-03-22 14:24:30 | Re: Let's invent a function to report lock-wait-blocking PIDs |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-03-22 14:02:39 | Re: Page replacement algorithm in buffer cache |