Re: Re: proposal: a width specification for s specifier (format function), fix behave when positional and ordered placeholders are used

From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com
Cc: dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com, pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com, sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: proposal: a width specification for s specifier (format function), fix behave when positional and ordered placeholders are used
Date: 2013-03-08 07:06:43
Message-ID: 20130308.160643.135920182.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello,

> Patches can be reviewed by more than one people. It's particularly
> useful if they have different things to say. So don't hesitate to
> review patches that have already been reviewed by other people.

Thanks for the advice. I was anxious about who among the
reviewers is, and when to make a decisision if the patch has
reached the level or not, I'll take it more easy.

> In fact, you can even review committed patches; it's not unlikely that
> you will be able to find bugs in those, too.

Umm.. to be sure..

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2013-03-08 07:30:45 Re: 9.2.3 crashes during archive recovery
Previous Message KONDO Mitsumasa 2013-03-08 06:56:14 Re: 9.2.3 crashes during archive recovery