| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Marko Tiikkaja <pgmail(at)joh(dot)to>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |
| Date: | 2013-02-20 19:35:35 |
| Message-ID: | 20130220193535.GL16142@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
* Kevin Grittner (kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com) wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> > Is TRUNCATE even the right command here? For regular tables
> > TRUNCATE is a fast DELETE, which logically empties the table.
> > For materialized views, there is no deleting, so this command (I
> > suppose?) just invalidates the materalized view. That's not the
> > same thing.
>
> Hmm. That's what Greg Stark just said, and I replied that nobody
> else had raised the issue in over three months. With Greg, that's
> two now.
TRUNCATE MAT VIEW seems like the right command to me. Just my 2c.
Thanks,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2013-02-20 21:25:50 | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2013-02-20 19:30:05 | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Phil Sorber | 2013-02-20 20:16:56 | Re: [PATCH] Add PQconninfoParseParams and PQconninfodefaultsMerge to libpq |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2013-02-20 19:30:05 | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |