From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: palloc unification |
Date: | 2013-02-06 14:38:35 |
Message-ID: | 20130206143835.GC4299@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas escribió:
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > I propose to have a new subdirectory src/include/shared, and two
> > header files:
> > The frontend (pg_malloc) function definitions would live somewhere in,
> > say, src/shared/fe_memutils.c. For the palloc() implementation, I think
> > we should create another file, so that frontend-only programs that do
> > not require those symbols (most of them) are not unnecessarily bloated.
> >
> > Opinions on having a new subdir?
> I like the idea of having a place for shared frontend and backend code
> very much, but I don't think src/include/shared or src/shared is a
> good name, because "shared" can mean a lot of things - like "shared
> library", for example. I think that this should be set up in a manner
> analogous to libpgport, except not for portability code, but instead
> for other stuff. Maybe we could call it libpgframework or something.
Yeah, I am doing this right now and the "shared" name doesn't seem so
good. "libpgframework" sounds decent. So since libpgport comes from
src/port, are we okay with src/framework and src/include/framework?
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2013-02-06 14:39:27 | Re: sql_drop Event Trigger |
Previous Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2013-02-06 14:36:38 | Re: sql_drop Event Trigger |