| From: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Brar Piening <brar(at)gmx(dot)de>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Visual Studio 2012 RC |
| Date: | 2013-02-05 18:22:06 |
| Message-ID: | 20130205182206.GA6494@tornado.leadboat.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 11:34:26AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> OK, I have looked at this and it seems perfectly sane. In fact, after a
> very frustrating time VS2012 is the *only* way I have found to get a 64
> bit build using MS tools on Windows 8. Given that, I propose to backport
> these changes to 9.2 so we can get some buildfarm coverage of that tool
> chain that includes the latest stable release.
Thanks for reviewing. A backpatch seems adequately low-risk to me.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2013-02-05 18:23:27 | Re: PATCH: Split stats file per database WAS: autovacuum stress-testing our system |
| Previous Message | Dave Byrne | 2013-02-05 18:13:07 | Exposing ArrayBuildState to pl/pgsql |