Re: [PATCH] pg_isready (was: [WIP] pg_ping utility)

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Phil Sorber <phil(at)omniti(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pg_isready (was: [WIP] pg_ping utility)
Date: 2013-02-05 14:06:43
Message-ID: 20130205140642.GA5753@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Phil Sorber escribió:
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 6:41 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Phil Sorber <phil(at)omniti(dot)com> wrote:
> >> OK, here is the patch that handles the connection string in dbname.
> >> I'll post the other patch under a different posting because I am sure
> >> it will get plenty of debate on it's own.
> >
> > I'm sorry, can you remind me what this does for us vs. the existing coding?
> >
>
> It's supposed to handle the connection string passed as dbname case to
> be able to get the right output for host:port.

Surely the idea is that you can also give it a postgres:// URI, right?

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Phil Sorber 2013-02-05 14:08:27 Re: [PATCH] pg_isready (was: [WIP] pg_ping utility)
Previous Message Phil Sorber 2013-02-05 14:02:32 Re: [PATCH] pg_isready (was: [WIP] pg_ping utility)