Re: pgsql: Stamp 9.1.8.

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Stamp 9.1.8.
Date: 2013-02-05 07:48:54
Message-ID: 20130205074854.GA27196@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 11:14:51PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> What perhaps *could* use a little more process IMO is the release notes.
> While we do put a fair amount of effort into the notes for major
> releases, the process for minor-release notes has generally been that
> either Bruce or I run around like mad on the release day to construct
> release notes from the commit logs. There have been gripes about the

Tom is being kind. Since I started traveling a few years ago, Tom has
created almost every minor release note document. (I am in India now.)

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2013-02-05 08:42:52 Re: pgsql: Stamp 9.1.8.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2013-02-05 04:14:51 Re: pgsql: Stamp 9.1.8.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavan Deolasee 2013-02-05 08:07:19 Re: Turning auto-analyze off (was Re: [GENERAL] Unusually high IO for autovacuum worker)
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2013-02-05 07:09:39 Re: json api WIP patch