Re: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables
Date: 2013-01-31 19:40:14
Message-ID: 20130131194014.GC4883@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera escribió:

> Okay, here's a patch along these lines. I haven't considered Jim's
> suggestion downthread about discounting dead tuples from relpages; maybe
> we can do that by subtracting the pages attributed to dead ones,
> estimating via tuple density (reltuples/relpages).

Patch attached.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
autovacuum-toast-wraparound-2.patch text/x-diff 11.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2013-01-31 19:54:31 Re: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2013-01-31 19:36:47 Re: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables