Re: Approval of duplicate message ids

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Approval of duplicate message ids
Date: 2013-01-30 19:42:58
Message-ID: 20130130194258.GA3761@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Tom Lane wrote:
> Last night, somebody seems to approved a bucketload of duplicate
> messages to pgsql-general, which judging from their headers were all
> injected by the same mail-agent fart at deltacom.com a couple of days
> ago. I know that the mail list software recognized these as duplicates,
> because back when it happened I got bounces related to the ones that had
> originally been from me. But apparently, nonetheless they went into the
> moderation queue and somebody whose sense of deja vu wasn't strong
> enough eventually approved them.

Yeah, apparently a moderator messed up.

I removed the deltacom.com subscriber the day you reported it. (I
forgot to reply here, sorry.)

> Why is that? Why aren't duplicate messageids/checksums rejected out of
> hand? Or at least clearly flagged to the moderators as something they
> should almost certainly reject not approve?

I don't think there's any reason why we don't reject duplicates. I just
copied the setting from the older system without thinking very much
about it.

> [ looks a bit closer... ] Also, it might be a good idea to summarily
> block mail.deltacom.com until they fix their problem, because it looks
> like there was a second batch of dups submitted yesterday.

Not sure about this. If we see a problem again, I will look into that.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2013-01-31 16:03:33 Re: Training approval policy on pg.org
Previous Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2013-01-27 18:57:14 Re: Wiki problem with URLs