| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alan B <alan77codebits(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Add clarification example to EXEC SQL CONNECT with password |
| Date: | 2013-01-25 18:43:01 |
| Message-ID: | 20130125184301.GG6848@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 01:41:06PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:50:12PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> (looks at the whole section) As-is, it's definitely not good, because
> >> before there were three independent examples, and now there are three
> >> and a half --- the added example depends on the variables declared in
> >> the third example. But using the blank line means you've formatted it
> >> as a stand-alone fourth example, which is not only wrong in itself but
> >> it screws up the meanings of both of the subsequent paragraphs.
>
> > OK, how is this? The C comment allows me to add 'or'.
>
> It's still completely failing to address the problem that it's formatted
> as a fourth, independent example. Please remove the blank line.
How is this?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| ecpg3.diff | text/x-diff | 862 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-01-25 18:43:59 | Re: Add clarification example to EXEC SQL CONNECT with password |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-01-25 18:41:06 | Re: Add clarification example to EXEC SQL CONNECT with password |