From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Inconsistent format() behavior for argument-count inconsistency |
Date: | 2013-01-18 18:10:56 |
Message-ID: | 20130118181056.GD16126@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> Why do we throw an error for too few arguments, but not too many?
Not sure offhand, though I could see how it might be useful. A use-case
might be that you have a variable template string which is user defined,
where they can choose from the arguments that are passed which ones they
want displayed and how. Otherwise, you'd have to have a bunch of
different call sites to format() depending on which options are
requested.
I'd go look at what C sprintf() does, as I feel like that's what we're
trying to emulate and see what it does.
There is also a patch that I reviewed/commented on about changing format
around a bit. I'm guessing it needs more review/work, just havn't
gotten back around to it yet.
Thanks,
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2013-01-18 18:12:18 | Re: in-catalog Extension Scripts and Control parameters (templates?) |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2013-01-18 18:03:26 | Re: Event Triggers: adding information |