From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Parallel query execution |
Date: | 2013-01-15 22:45:15 |
Message-ID: | 20130115224515.GJ27934@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:39:10PM +0000, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On 15 January 2013 22:14, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > I believe it is time to start adding parallel execution to the backend.
> > We already have some parallelism in the backend:
> > effective_io_concurrency and helper processes. I think it is time we
> > start to consider additional options.
>
> A few months back, I remarked [1] that speeding up sorting using
> pipelining and asynchronous I/O was probably parallelism low-hanging
> fruit. That hasn't changed, though I personally still don't have the
> bandwidth to look into it in a serious way.
>
> [1] http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAEYLb_VeZpKDX54VEx3X30oy_UOTh89XoejJW6aucjjiUjskXw@mail.gmail.com
OK, I added the link to the wiki.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2013-01-15 22:45:46 | Re: json api WIP patch |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2013-01-15 22:39:10 | Re: Parallel query execution |