Re: pg_ctl idempotent option

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_ctl idempotent option
Date: 2013-01-15 19:29:45
Message-ID: 20130115192945.GF27934@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:55:41AM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 1/14/13 10:22 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Idempotent is a ten-dollar word. Can we find something that average
> > people wouldn't need to consult a dictionary to understand?
>
> My suggestion in the original thread was --oknodo, but people didn't
> like that either.

That's Japanese for idempotent. ;-) LOL

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Boszormenyi Zoltan 2013-01-15 19:36:39 Re: pg_ctl idempotent option
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2013-01-15 19:28:56 Re: pg_ctl idempotent option