Re: postgres & smp

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Graichen <graichen(at)innominate(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: postgres & smp
Date: 2001-02-18 23:02:53
Message-ID: 20126.982537373@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Thomas Graichen <news-list(dot)pgsql(dot)admin(at)innominate(dot)de> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Hm, did you set commit_delay to zero? What are the other postmaster
>> parameters (especially -B) ?

> i used 32 clients -N set to 128 and -B to 256 - commit_delay was
> set to 5 (default) - do you expect much better smp results with
> commit_delay=0?

Possibly. See adjacent thread about 7.1b4 performance.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 2001-02-19 08:15:03 Re: [HACKERS] Re: v7.1b4 bad performance
Previous Message Dmitry Morozovsky 2001-02-18 20:54:33 Re: v7.1b4 bad performance