From: | Vladimir Kamarzin <vvk(at)vvk(dot)pp(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Performance degradation in 324577f39bc8738ed0ec24c36c5cb2c2f81ec660 |
Date: | 2014-10-08 08:40:23 |
Message-ID: | 2012271412757623@web3g.yandex.ru |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
07.10.2014, 19:59, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> Vladimir Kamarzin <vvk(at)vvk(dot)pp(dot)ru> writes:
>> After upgrade from 9.3.1 to 9.3.5 we expirienced a slight performance degradation of all queries. Query time increased to some amount of ms, mostly in range of 100ms. Some actions in our application results in a lot of small queries and in such cases performance degradation is very significant - total action performs for a 2-3 times longer then before (15s -> 40s, etc).
>> Using git-bisect we've found a bad revision causes performance drop: it is 324577f39bc8738ed0ec24c36c5cb2c2f81ec660
>
> Hm. If you're going to do queries that involve update/delete across large
> inheritance trees, that bug fix is unavoidably going to cost you some
> cycles.
Yeah, we're actually noticed significantly increased CPU load while running on 9.3.5.
> I am wondering if you've
> misidentified the commit that made the difference --- especially since you
> claim there's a penalty for "all" queries, which there manifestly couldn't
> be with this particular patch.
No, problem appears exactly on this commit. Actually I don't really sure about "all": we don't see degradation when performing plain SELECTs manually,
but comparing logged query time of some SELECTs we see the differences.
Here is example 42ms -> 250ms:
http://pastebin.ca/2855292
http://pastebin.ca/2855290
> If not, there must be something rather
> unusual about your queries or schema. Care to provide a self-contained
> test case?
I'm afraid we cannot do this now. If you wish, we can give you ssh access to the test server to investigate the problem.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrey Lizenko | 2014-10-08 09:48:35 | Re: query plan question, nested loop vs hash join |
Previous Message | and | 2014-10-08 06:35:02 | Bad optimization/planning on Postgres window-based queries (partition by(, group by?)) - 1000x speedup |