From: | John Rouillard <rouilj(at)renesys(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Richard Neill <rn214(at)richardneill(dot)org> |
Cc: | "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Why does the query planner use two full indexes, when a dedicated partial index exists? (solved?) |
Date: | 2012-12-24 20:42:52 |
Message-ID: | 20121224204252.GG7039@renesys.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 06:37:11PM +0000, Richard Neill wrote:
> [...]
> So... problem solved for me: I just have to reindex every few hours.
> BUT, this suggests a few remaining things:
> [...]
> 2. Is there any way to force the planner to use (or ignore) a
> specific index, for testing purposes, short of actually dropping the
> index?
> This would be very useful for debugging, especially given that query
> plans can only really be fully tested on production systems, and
> that dropping indexes is rather a bad thing to do when live
> operation is simultaneously happening on that server!
I believe that:
BEGIN;
drop index ....
explain analyze ...
explain analyze ...
ROLLBACK;
will do what you want. IIUC Postgres allows DDL within transactions
and thus be rolled back and the operations within the transaction
aren't visible to your other queries running outside the transaction.
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Transactional_DDL_in_PostgreSQL:_A_Competitive_Analysis
and
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/sql-dropindex.html
--
-- rouilj
John Rouillard System Administrator
Renesys Corporation 603-244-9084 (cell) 603-643-9300 x 111
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2012-12-27 04:03:32 | Re: Why does the query planner use two full indexes, when a dedicated partial index exists? |
Previous Message | Charles Gomes | 2012-12-24 19:29:35 | Re: Performance on Bulk Insert to Partitioned Table |