From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Bernhard Schrader <bernhard(dot)schrader(at)innogames(dot)de>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [ADMIN] Problems with enums after pg_upgrade |
Date: | 2012-12-18 18:39:16 |
Message-ID: | 20121218183916.GA7666@awork2.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers |
On 2012-12-18 13:24:12 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bernhard Schrader <bernhard(dot)schrader(at)innogames(dot)de> writes:
> > Beside of that, we tested a little bit more with the failing query:
> > The statement which is causing the error is a big UPDATE-statement with
> > FROM. After some testing we figured out that the subselect in the
> > FROM-clause is working fine. And if we simplify the UPDATE-statement
> > it's also working. We're able to show the data and we're able to do
> > simple updates on the table. But the two things combined are not
> > working.
>
> Does the table being updated have any indexes on enum columns? I'm
> suspicious that the bogus OID is in an index page somewhere, and not
> in the table at all.
I already wondered whether it could be a problem caused by pg_upgrade
not ignoring invalid indexes until recently, but I don't really see how
it could cause an invalid oid to end up in the index.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2012-12-18 19:24:33 | Re: PostgreSQL Performance Tuning / Postgresql.conf and on OS Level |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2012-12-18 18:37:15 | Re: [ADMIN] Problems with enums after pg_upgrade |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-12-18 19:34:33 | Re: [ADMIN] Problems with enums after pg_upgrade |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2012-12-18 18:37:15 | Re: [ADMIN] Problems with enums after pg_upgrade |