Re: logical decoding - GetOldestXmin

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: logical decoding - GetOldestXmin
Date: 2012-12-13 22:37:11
Message-ID: 20121213223708.GE28882@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2012-12-13 17:29:06 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > It moves a computation of the sort of:
> >
> > result -= vacuum_defer_cleanup_age;
> > if (!TransactionIdIsNormal(result))
> > result = FirstNormalTransactionId;
> >
> > inside ProcArrayLock. But I can't really imagine that to be relevant...
>
> I can. Go look at some of the 9.2 optimizations around
> GetSnapshotData(). Those made a BIG difference under heavy
> concurrency and they were definitely micro-optimization. For example,
> the introduction of NormalTransactionIdPrecedes() was shockingly
> effective.

But GetOldestXmin() should be called less frequently than
GetSnapshotData() by several orders of magnitudes. I don't really see
it being used in any really hot code paths?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-12-13 22:49:58 Re: Logical decoding & exported base snapshot
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-12-13 22:29:06 Re: logical decoding - GetOldestXmin