Re: CommitFest 2012-11 Progress

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CommitFest 2012-11 Progress
Date: 2012-12-08 16:34:08
Message-ID: 20121208163408.GC24326@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Noah,

On 2012-12-08 09:06:01 -0500, Noah Misch wrote:
> We're entering the last planned week of the CF. Apart from a 72-hour period
> in mid-November, some CF has remained in-progress continuously for the last
> 176 days. With 64 out of the 82 current patches unresolved, we're on track to
> again see no gap between CF 2012-11 and CF 2013-01. The process as practiced
> today is a shell of its former self[1][2]. Authors, reviewers, committers:
> has the process changed to something better, worthy of formally replacing its
> predecessor? Or, rather, do we need a fresh process correction?

I agree that lately there seems to be minimal benefit of the commitfest
process. I don't see many disadvantages either, but...

No idea how to fix that, it seems most people are simply swamped with
work and stuff.

I made a pass through most of the commitfest entries to update their
state to something sensible and where it seemed necessary inquired the
newest status.
Not sure thats really welcome, but it was the only thing I could think
of helping to make some progress.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Boszormenyi Zoltan 2012-12-08 17:42:45 Re: [PATCH] lock_timeout and common SIGALRM framework
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2012-12-08 16:16:47 Re: review: pgbench - aggregation of info written into log