Re: Review: Extra Daemons / bgworker

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>, kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Review: Extra Daemons / bgworker
Date: 2012-12-05 21:29:01
Message-ID: 20121205212901.GR27424@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2012-12-05 12:09:58 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Here's a first attempt at a new documentation chapter. This goes in
> part "Server Programming", just after the SPI chapter.
>
> I just noticed that worker_spi could use some more sample code, for
> example auth_counter was getting its own LWLock and also its own shmem
> area, which would be helpful to demonstrate I think.

I am not exactly renowned for my english skills, but I have made a pass
over the file made some slight changes and extended it in two places.
I've also added a comment with a question that came to my mind when
reading the docs...

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
bgworker.patch text/x-patch 4.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2012-12-05 21:33:19 Re: PITR potentially broken in 9.2
Previous Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2012-12-05 21:28:06 strange isolation test buildfarm failure on guaibasaurus