Re: PITR potentially broken in 9.2

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PITR potentially broken in 9.2
Date: 2012-11-28 13:47:47
Message-ID: 20121128134746.GB18785@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On 2012-11-28 15:37:38 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 28.11.2012 15:26, Andres Freund wrote:
> >Hm. Are you sure its actually reading your backup file? Its hard to say
> >without DEBUG1 output but I would tentatively say its not reading it at
> >all because the the "redo starts at ..." message indicates its not using
> >the checkpoint location from the backup file.
>
> By backup file, you mean the backup history file? Since 9.0, recovery does
> not read the backup history file, it's for informational/debugging purposes
> only. All the information recovery needs is in the backup_label, and an
> end-of-backup WAL record marks the location where pg_stop_backup() was
> called, ie. how far the WAL must be replayed for the backup to be
> consistent.
>

I mean the label read by read_backup_label(). Jeff's mail indicated it
had CHECKPOINT_LOCATION at 1/188D8120 but redo started at 1/CD89E48.

>Can you reproduce the issue? If so, can you give an exact guide? If not,
> >do you still have the datadir et al. from above?

> I just committed a fix for this, but if you can, it would still be nice if
> you could double-check that it now really works.

Yuck. Too bad that that got in.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2012-11-28 14:34:55 Re: PITR potentially broken in 9.2
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2012-11-28 13:37:38 Re: PITR potentially broken in 9.2

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Markus Wanner 2012-11-28 13:57:26 Review: Extra Daemons / bgworker
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2012-11-28 13:37:38 Re: PITR potentially broken in 9.2