Re: splitting *_desc routines

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: splitting *_desc routines
Date: 2012-11-27 16:10:22
Message-ID: 20121127161022.GJ4227@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs escribió:
> On 23 November 2012 22:52, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > ./access/rmgrdesc/xact_desc.c
> > ./access/rmgrdesc/heapdesc.c
>
> Could we have either all underscores _ or none at all for the naming?

Sure, removed them all.

Tom Lane escribió:

> FWIW, I'd vote for dumping all of these into *one* rmgrdesc directory
> (which may as well be under access/ since that's where the xlog code is),
> regardless of where the corresponding replay code is in the source tree.
> I don't think splitting them up into half a dozen directories adds
> anything except confusion. If you want, the header comment for each
> file could mention where the corresponding replay code lives.

Done that way.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
splitdesc-3.patch text/x-diff 75.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-11-27 16:34:38 Re: splitting *_desc routines
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-11-27 16:00:11 Re: ilist.h fails cpluspluscheck