From: | "Kevin Grittner" <kgrittn(at)mail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>,"Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | "Pgsql Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |
Date: | 2012-11-26 21:34:36 |
Message-ID: | 20121126213436.127710@gmx.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
David Fetter wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 09:46:33AM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> So, the way I understand it, in Oracle terms, this feature is a
>> "snapshot", not a materialized view. Maybe that's what it should
>> be called then.
>
> "Snapshot" is one of the options for refreshing an Oracle
> materialized view. There are others, which we'll eventually add
> if past is any prologue :)
That's the way I understand it, too.
> I hate to add to the bike-shedding, but we should probably add
> REFRESH SNAPSHOT as an optional piece of the grammar, with more
> REFRESH options to come.
I would prefer to leave the syntax for refreshing MVs to a later
patch. I'm kind of assuming that SNAPSHOT would be the default if
no other options are specified, but I would prefer not to get into
too much speculation about add-on patches for fear of derailing
this initial effort.
-Kevin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Fetter | 2012-11-26 21:37:17 | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2012-11-26 21:24:33 | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |