From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)mail(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |
Date: | 2012-11-26 16:05:21 |
Message-ID: | 20121126160521.GD31816@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:02:17PM +0000, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On 26 November 2012 15:24, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
> > I hate to add to the bike-shedding, but we should probably add
> > REFRESH SNAPSHOT as an optional piece of the grammar, with more
> > REFRESH options to come.
>
> I don't know that they should be called materialised views, but do
> we really need to overload the word snapshot? I'd just as soon
> invent a new word as use the Oracle one, since I don't think the
> term snapshot is widely recognised as referring to anything other
> than snapshot isolation.
I believe that the meaning here is unambiguous, and is used in other
descriptions than Oracle's, including the one on our wiki.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2012-11-26 16:05:47 | Re: Duplicated oids between tables - problem or not? |
Previous Message | Pavan Deolasee | 2012-11-26 16:05:05 | Re: Upcoming back-branch releases |