Re: Materialized views WIP patch

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)mail(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Materialized views WIP patch
Date: 2012-11-26 16:05:21
Message-ID: 20121126160521.GD31816@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:02:17PM +0000, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On 26 November 2012 15:24, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
> > I hate to add to the bike-shedding, but we should probably add
> > REFRESH SNAPSHOT as an optional piece of the grammar, with more
> > REFRESH options to come.
>
> I don't know that they should be called materialised views, but do
> we really need to overload the word snapshot? I'd just as soon
> invent a new word as use the Oracle one, since I don't think the
> term snapshot is widely recognised as referring to anything other
> than snapshot isolation.

I believe that the meaning here is unambiguous, and is used in other
descriptions than Oracle's, including the one on our wiki.

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2012-11-26 16:05:47 Re: Duplicated oids between tables - problem or not?
Previous Message Pavan Deolasee 2012-11-26 16:05:05 Re: Upcoming back-branch releases