From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)mail(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |
Date: | 2012-11-26 15:24:56 |
Message-ID: | 20121126152456.GA31816@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 09:46:33AM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 11/14/12 9:28 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> > 17. Since the data viewed in an MV is not up-to-date with the
> > latest committed transaction,
>
> So, the way I understand it, in Oracle terms, this feature is a
> "snapshot", not a materialized view. Maybe that's what it should be
> called then.
"Snapshot" is one of the options for refreshing an Oracle materialized
view. There are others, which we'll eventually add if past is any
prologue :)
I hate to add to the bike-shedding, but we should probably add REFRESH
SNAPSHOT as an optional piece of the grammar, with more REFRESH
options to come.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2012-11-26 15:26:27 | Re: [WIP] pg_ping utility |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2012-11-26 15:19:21 | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |