| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 8.4 doc bug for "Incrementally Updated Backups" |
| Date: | 2012-11-24 01:36:44 |
| Message-ID: | 20121124013644.GA9382@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 04:26:48PM -0800, Jeff Janes wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> >
> > We don't assume people are reading docs from very old versions.
> >
>
> Even if that is the version they are using? It is, after all, still
> under maintenance,
There are three options for doc patches:
1. patch only git head, meaning the next major release
2. do #1, plus the most recent major released version, e.g. 9.2.X
3. #1, #2, and all major supported released versions
In general, #1 is normally for wording clarifications, #2 is for usage
clarifications, and #3 is to correct mistakes. Not sure I follow that
100%, but that is what I normally do.
Is that process good? Did I not follow it?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Satoshi Nagayasu | 2012-11-24 02:57:51 | pg_buffercache description |
| Previous Message | Jeff Janes | 2012-11-24 00:26:48 | Re: 8.4 doc bug for "Incrementally Updated Backups" |