From: | Ryan Kelly <rpkelly22(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Set returning functions in the SELECT list |
Date: | 2012-11-16 14:14:33 |
Message-ID: | 20121116141433.GA3716@llserver.lakeliving.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I have a question about the behavior of SRFs in the SELECT list.
Consider the following example:
select
generate_series(1,2),
generate_series(1,2)
;
And its output:
generate_series | generate_series
-----------------+-----------------
1 | 1
2 | 2
And then this example:
select
generate_series(1,2),
generate_series(1,3)
;
generate_series | generate_series
-----------------+-----------------
1 | 1
2 | 2
1 | 3
2 | 1
1 | 2
2 | 3
My question is "why?" I actually expected the second behavior in both
cases. Also, I'm not sure where this difference in behavior is
documented. I looked at:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/xfunc-sql.html#XFUNC-SQL-FUNCTIONS-RETURNING-SET
but it doesn't seem to be explicitly mentioned there.
And yes, I understand doing this is deprecated and my results would
probably be better achieved with LATERAL when 9.3 comes out.
-Ryan Kelly
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2012-11-16 15:28:32 | Re: High SYS CPU - need advise |
Previous Message | David Johnston | 2012-11-16 13:26:04 | Re: Aggeregate funtion calculating the average value of each same index of an array column in a table |