Re: Further pg_upgrade analysis for many tables

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Ants Aasma <ants(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Further pg_upgrade analysis for many tables
Date: 2012-11-14 00:51:45
Message-ID: 20121114005145.GB13888@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 07:03:51PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I am attaching an updated pg_upgrade patch, which I believe is ready for
> application for 9.3.

Correction, here is the proper patch. The previous posted version was
had pending merges from the master branch.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

Attachment Content-Type Size
pg_upgrade.diff text/x-diff 11.8 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2012-11-14 02:46:19 Re: Doc patch, index search_path where it's used to secure functions
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2012-11-14 00:10:27 Re: Add contrib module functions to docs' function index