From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: AutoVacuum starvation from sinval messages |
Date: | 2012-11-09 15:08:20 |
Message-ID: | 20121109150820.GA12633@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane escribió:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > IIRC the queue has 4K entries, and IIRC a single DDL
> > operation might provoke a couple of sinvals, but I'm thinking that
> > somebody would probably have to be creating >1024 temp tables a minute
> > to overrun the queue, which is very possible but not necessarily
> > common.
>
> Well, one DDL typically generates multiple messages --- one for each
> catalog row added/modified/removed, roughly speaking. When I run the
> constant create/drop example Jeff posted, I see the AV launcher getting
> a catchup signal every few seconds. I didn't try to determine exactly
> how many create/drop cycles that was, but I'm pretty sure it's a lot
> less than 1000.
Just creating the sequence for the serial column means 16 pg_attribute
tuples. There's also two pg_class entries, one more pg_attribute, two
pg_type entries, a bunch of pg_depend entries ... I doubt it's less than
30 catalog tuples, all things considered. Double that for the drop. So
for a 4k entry table that needs to get 50% full, that's only ~35 temp
table creations like that.
I hadn't realized sequences used so many pg_attribute entries.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-11-09 15:13:01 | Re: AutoVacuum starvation from sinval messages |
Previous Message | Marti Raudsepp | 2012-11-09 14:55:16 | Re: TRUNCATE SERIALIZABLE and frozen COPY |