| From: | "Kevin Grittner" <kgrittn(at)mail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "John R Pierce" <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>,pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: commit problem |
| Date: | 2012-10-25 22:10:48 |
| Message-ID: | 20121025221048.306920@gmx.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
John R Pierce wrote:
> my developers don't think simple reads ARE a transaction.
Now you've piqued my interest. To run multiple simple selects which
should see a consistent view of the data, wouldn't they expect they
could setTransactionIsolation() to TRANSACTION_REPEATABLE_READ or
TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE and setAutoCommit() false to see a stable
view of the data? How would they say they were done with that view
and wanted a fresh one for the next batch of SELECT statements?
-Kevin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2012-10-26 06:54:01 | Re: Publish artifacts to Maven central |
| Previous Message | Thomas Kellerer | 2012-10-25 22:09:14 | Re: commit problem |