Re: commit problem

From: "Kevin Grittner" <kgrittn(at)mail(dot)com>
To: "John R Pierce" <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>,pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: commit problem
Date: 2012-10-25 22:04:31
Message-ID: 20121025220432.306900@gmx.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

John R Pierce wrote:
> On 10/25/12 1:45 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> > Sounds ugly. What I wonder is why the your development team doesn't
> > route all transaction completions through a common method. I have
> > always seen that as the only sane way to do it. Then you have one
> > place where you can change:
> >
> > conn.commit();
>
> because my developers don't think simple reads ARE a transaction.
>
>
>
> --
> john r pierce N 37, W 122
> santa cruz ca mid-left coast
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Kellerer 2012-10-25 22:07:07 Re: commit problem
Previous Message Thomas Kellerer 2012-10-25 21:56:18 Re: commit problem