| From: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Incorrect behaviour when using a GiST index on points |
| Date: | 2012-10-23 16:35:15 |
| Message-ID: | 20121023163515.GA18141@tornado.leadboat.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:18:48AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Please see downthread -- there is some commentary from Noah ([1] and
> others) about the patch itself. As far I understand, some changes are
> still needed, and I don't know if the last version submitted is the
> version that should be backpatched.
We'd best use the same patch for both HEAD and back branches; pg_upgrade would
carry forward faulty indexes. pg_upgrade could instead invalidate them, but I
don't think the gravity of the problem calls for it. A release note
suggesting a REINDEX of affected indexes ought to suffice.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-10-23 16:47:48 | Re: [RFC] CREATE QUEUE (log-only table) for londiste/pgQ ccompatibility |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-10-23 16:29:11 | Re: "pg_ctl promote" exit status |