Re: Bugs in CREATE/DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY

From: "Kevin Grittner" <kgrittn(at)mail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>,"Andres Freund" <andres(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>,pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bugs in CREATE/DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY
Date: 2012-10-21 22:34:38
Message-ID: 20121021223438.224570@gmx.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > This needs to be back-patched, no?
>
> Looking at that now.

Back-patched to 9.2.  I don't know how I got it in my head that this
was a pending 9.3 feature.  I'll check next time, even if I think I
know.

Thanks to both Andres and Tom for pointing that out.

-Kevin

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vik Reykja 2012-10-22 03:23:35 Re: Re: [PATCH] Enforce that INSERT...RETURNING preserves the order of multi rows
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2012-10-21 22:22:31 Re: No, pg_size_pretty(numeric) was not such a hot idea