From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] pg_dump: Sort overloaded functions in deterministic order |
Date: | 2012-10-18 15:26:33 |
Message-ID: | 20121018152633.GF1982@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Joel Jacobson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > Uh, the patch you posted keeps the pg_get_function_identity_arguments
> > call in dumpFunc, but there is now also a new one in getFuncs. Do we
> > need to remove the second one?
>
> It could be done, but unfortunately we cannot use the value computed
> in dumpFunc(),
> because getFuncs() is called before dumpFunc().
Right, I got that from the discussion.
> What could be done is to keep the changes in getFuncs(), and also
> change dumpFunc()
> to use the value computed in getFuncs(), but I think the gain is small
> in relation
> to the complexity of changing dumpFunc(), as we would still need to
> make the two other
> function calls in the SQL query in dumpFunc() to pg_get_function_arguments() and
> pg_get_function_result().
Changing pg_dump is complex enough whatever the change, yes. I have not
touched this.
> > Here's an updated patch for your consideration. I was about to push
> > this when I noticed the above. The only change here is that the extra
> > code that tests for new remoteVersions in the second "else if" branch of
> > getFuncs and getAggregates has been removed, since it cannot ever be
> > reached.
>
> Looks really good.
Thanks, pushed it.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2012-10-18 15:29:52 | Re: Review for pg_dump: Sort overloaded functions in deterministic order |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2012-10-18 15:25:57 | Re: [RFC][PATCH] wal decoding, attempt #2 - Design Documents (really attached) |