Re: Two identical systems, radically different performance

From: David Thomas <david(at)digitaldogma(dot)org>
To: Craig James <cjames(at)emolecules(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Two identical systems, radically different performance
Date: 2012-10-09 16:14:48
Message-ID: 20121009161448.GA27123@digitaldogma.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 04:40:31PM -0700, Craig James wrote:
> Nobody has commented on the hyperthreading question yet ... does it
> really matter? The old (fast) server has hyperthreading disabled, and
> the new (slower) server has hyperthreads enabled.
> If hyperthreading is definitely NOT an issue, it will save me a trip to
> the co-lo facility.

From my reading it seems that hyperthreading hasn't been a major issue
for quite sometime on modern kernels.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2004-10/msg00052.php

I doubt it would hurt much, but I wouldn't make a special trip to the
co-lo to change it.
--
DavidT

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig James 2012-10-09 16:41:27 Re: Two identical systems, radically different performance
Previous Message Shaun Thomas 2012-10-09 16:02:29 Re: Two identical systems, radically different performance