Re: pg_reorg in core?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_reorg in core?
Date: 2012-09-26 19:29:38
Message-ID: 20120926192938.GB17480@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 03:55:35PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 9/24/12 3:43 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On 24 September 2012 17:36, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>> For me, the Postgres user interface should include
> >>>> * REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
> >>
> >> I don't see why we don't have REINDEX CONCURRENTLY now.
> >
> > Same reason for everything on (anyone's) TODO list.
>
> Yes, I'm just pointing out that it would be a very small patch for
> someone, and that AFAIK it didn't make it on the TODO list yet.

I see it on the TODO list, and it has been there for years:

https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#Indexes
Add REINDEX CONCURRENTLY, like CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2012-09-26 20:54:43 Re: pg_signal_backend() asymmetry
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2012-09-26 19:12:24 Re: alter enum add value if not exists