Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Rural Hunter <ruralhunter(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed
Date: 2012-09-24 15:07:33
Message-ID: 20120924150733.GF21242@momjian.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 11:04:32AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Well, if you run that query on template0 in the old and new cluster, you
> > will see something different in the two of them. Could you have used
> > default in one and a non-dash in the other. Did we change the way we
> > canonicalize the locale between 9.1 and 9.2?
>
> IIRC, we didn't try to canonicalize locale names at all before 9.2.
> That initdb code you're quoting is of fairly recent vintage.

Ah, so that would explain the change he is seeing. I will work on a
patch. I am working on the information_schema patch now.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2012-09-24 15:22:22 Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-09-24 15:04:32 Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2012-09-24 15:15:32 Re: pg_reorg in core?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-09-24 15:04:32 Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed