Re: Draft release notes complete

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Draft release notes complete
Date: 2012-09-10 15:19:00
Message-ID: 20120910151900.GB25252@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:06:18PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > It is this kind of run-around that caused me to generate my own doc
> > build in the past; maybe I need to return to doing my own doc build.
>
> You keep threatening with that. You are free, of course, to do anything
> you want, and no one will break sweat about it. I already said I will
> work on getting this up and running, but I can't give you a deadline for
> when it'll be working.

My point is that this frequent doc build feature was removed with no
discussion, and adding it seems to be some herculean job that requires
red tape only a government worker would love.

I have already started working on updating my script for git --- should
be done shortly, so you can remove my request.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aidan Van Dyk 2012-09-10 15:28:57 Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol
Previous Message Amit kapila 2012-09-10 15:16:14 Re: [WIP PATCH] for Performance Improvement in Buffer Management