From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade diffs on WIndows |
Date: | 2012-09-05 19:51:56 |
Message-ID: | 20120905195156.GD8774@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 03:50:13PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >>The second lot of CRs (seen in the second dump file in the diff i
> >>previously sent) is produced by pg_upgrade writing its output in
> >>text mode, which turns LF into CRLF. The solution to that is the
> >>patch to dump.c I posted, which, as Bruce observed, does the same
> >>thing that pg_dumpall does. Arguably, it should also open the input
> >>file in binary, so that if there really is a CRLF in the dump it
> >>won't be eaten.
> >So, right now we are only add \r for function bodies, which is mostly
> >harmless, but what if a function body has strings with an embedded
> >newlines? What about creating a table with newlines in its identifiers:
> >
> >CREATE TABLE "a
> >b" ("c
> >d" int);
> >
> >If \r is added in there, it would be a data corruption problem. Can you
> >test that?
>
> These are among the reasons why I am suggesting opening the file in
> binary mode. You're right, that would be data corruption.
>
> I can set up a check, but it will take a bit of time.
My only point is that this is no longer a buildfarm failure issue, it is
a potential data corruption issue.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2012-09-05 20:22:18 | Re: pg_upgrade diffs on WIndows |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2012-09-05 19:50:13 | Re: pg_upgrade diffs on WIndows |