From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade del/rmdir path fix |
Date: | 2012-09-04 15:13:26 |
Message-ID: | 20120904151326.GQ24132@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 11:12:52AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 09/04/2012 10:49 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 11:42:58AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >>Excerpts from Andrew Dunstan's message of mar sep 04 01:16:39 -0300 2012:
> >>
> >>>And here's the first Windows buildfarm check of pg_upgrade.
> >>><http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=pitta&dt=2012-09-04%2003%3A00%3A05&stg=check-pg_upgrade>
> >>Great, thanks.
> >>
> >>Who's going to work now on porting the shell script to Perl? ;-)
> >Well, we require Perl for development, but not for usage, at least not
> >yet. There was talk of needing Perl for doing standby pg_upgrade, but
> >there were too many concerns about that idea.
>
>
> This is a test script, not what you should use in production. I
> don't see any reason why we shouldn't require Perl for running the
> standard test.
Oh, I thought he was talking about the scripts pg_upgrade creates for
users to run. Sorry.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2012-09-04 15:15:58 | Re: Wiki link for max_connections? (Fwd: Re: [ADMIN] PostgreSQL oom_adj postmaster process to -17) |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2012-09-04 15:12:52 | Re: pg_upgrade del/rmdir path fix |