From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi |
Subject: | Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol |
Date: | 2012-09-03 20:38:09 |
Message-ID: | 201209032238.09694.andres@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Monday, September 03, 2012 10:23:52 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm reluctantly coming to the conclusion that we can't pass these
> parameters through the regular libpq connection string mechanism, and
> will have to invent something else. That's awfully nasty though;
> it will pretty much cripple the idea that this would be a simple way to
> invoke a quasi-embedded variant of Postgres.
What I am asking myself is: why does that have to go through the normal
PQconnectdb* api? This is something completely new and very well might grow
more features that are not necessarily easy to press into PQconnectdb().
PQServer
PQstartServer(const char **keywords, const char **values);
or whatever seems to be more future proof especially considering the
possibility that this will grow into something more featureful.
Greetings,
Andres
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-09-03 20:50:22 | Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol |
Previous Message | Kohei KaiGai | 2012-09-03 20:32:46 | Re: [v9.3] Row-Level Security |