From: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Is this an appropriate item? |
Date: | 2012-08-23 02:46:38 |
Message-ID: | 20120823.114638.866621879871652201.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I found following item in the Developer FAQ.
>> I don't see why this is related to developers.
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Why aren't there more compression options when dumping tables?
>>
>
> it looks more like a TODO, or we think we are not interested on this?
> if the latter, then it probably is part of the "things we don't want"
> of the dev faq
>
> btw, the previous item is this:
> "Why don't you use threads, raw devices, async-I/O, <insert your
> favorite wizz-bang feature here>?"
>
> what's the difference about the async-I/O mentioned here and
> "synchronous_commit=off", if there is none maybe we should remove that
> part
BTW, this:
>> Why aren't there more compression options when dumping tables?
is a subsection of this:
> "Why don't you use threads, raw devices, async-I/O, <insert your> favorite wizz-bang feature here>?"
I don't see any relationship between former and latter.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alex Hunsaker | 2012-08-23 02:48:09 | Re: Unexpected plperl difference between 8.4 and 9.1 |
Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2012-08-23 02:40:58 | Re: Is this an appropriate item? |