Re: pgsql: In docs, change a few cases of "not important" to "unimportant".

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: In docs, change a few cases of "not important" to "unimportant".
Date: 2012-08-16 14:49:03
Message-ID: 20120816144903.GJ8353@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 05:42:45PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 16.08.2012 17:36, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >In docs, change a few cases of "not important" to "unimportant".
>
> FWIW, I don't think these changes were an improvement. I find "not
> important" more readable in those sentences.

Really? All of them? I only did a few. Some were better as "not
important" and I left those. Let me know.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2012-08-16 15:15:24 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Clean up the #include mess a little.
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2012-08-16 14:42:54 pgsql: Rewrite window function reference section to more clearly explai

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-08-16 14:59:12 Re: UNION ALL with WHERE clause does not use Merge Append
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2012-08-16 14:42:45 Re: pgsql: In docs, change a few cases of "not important" to "unimportant".