| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: WIP: pg_pretty_query |
| Date: | 2012-08-07 15:53:45 |
| Message-ID: | 20120807155345.GM29773@momjian.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 04:14:34PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Hello
>
> last year we are spoke about reusing pretty print view code for some queries.
>
> Here is patch:
>
> this patch is really short - it is nice. But - it works only with
> known database objects (probably we would it) and it doesn't format
> subqueries well
>
>
> postgres=# select pg_pretty_query('select x.*, z.* from foo, foo x, x
> z where x.a = 10 and x.a = 30 and EXISTS(SELECT * FROM foo WHERE a =
> z.a)', true, false);
> pg_pretty_query
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> SELECT x.a, z.a +
> FROM foo, foo x, x z +
> WHERE x.a = 10 AND x.a = 30 AND (EXISTS ( SELECT foo.a+
> FROM foo +
> WHERE foo.a = z.a))
> (1 row)
I can see this as very useful for people reporting badly-formatted
queries to our email lists. Great!
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2012-08-07 16:30:42 | Re: WIP: pg_pretty_query |
| Previous Message | Jeff MacDonald | 2012-08-07 15:16:06 | Re: [PATCH] Docs: Make notes on sequences and rollback more obvious |