From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Jim(dot)Smith(at)Bull(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Gartner report on Postgresql |
Date: | 2012-07-27 01:37:26 |
Message-ID: | 20120727013726.GH24238@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 09:33:59PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:36:41PM -0700, Jim(dot)Smith(at)Bull(dot)com wrote:
> >
> > I have a potential customer that would like to see a Gartner review which
> > includes PostgreSQL. Has anyone seen something like this?
>
> No, but you might find this interesting: ;-)
>
> Why does the IT industry continue to listen to Gartner?
> http://www.zdnet.com/why-does-the-it-industry-continue-to-listen-to-gartner-7000001394/
Oh, and if you are interested in Forrester, look at this 2009 Ingres
article summary: ;-)
http://info.actian.com/g/?UJR6Q22767=clicksrc:ingres-analyst
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2012-07-27 02:36:38 | Re: Gartner report on Postgresql |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-07-27 01:33:59 | Re: Gartner report on Postgresql |