Re: Primary key vs unique index

From: hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com>
To: rverghese <riyav(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Primary key vs unique index
Date: 2012-07-06 17:01:39
Message-ID: 20120706170139.GA17175@depesz.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 09:07:53AM -0700, rverghese wrote:
> We are experiencing a similar problem, even though we are on 8.4 and have
> been for a while, and have autovacuum turned on. I have regular concurrent
> reindexes on the indexes but the primary key is seriously bloated. I was
> considering doing the same thing, that is, create another primary key that
> is built on a sequence ( primarily for slony) and then change my current
> multi-column primary key to a unique index. Have you been able to work
> around the problem in any other way?

http://www.depesz.com/2011/07/06/bloat-happens/

depesz

--
The best thing about modern society is how easy it is to avoid contact with it.
http://depesz.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ach 2012-07-06 17:05:08 index and data tablespaces on two separate drives or one RAID 0?
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2012-07-06 16:41:52 Re: Dynamic query execution using array