| From: | David Kerr <dmk(at)mr-paradox(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Drop statistics? |
| Date: | 2012-06-22 18:04:36 |
| Message-ID: | 20120622180436.GB94572@mr-paradox.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 01:27:51PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
- David Kerr <dmk(at)mr-paradox(dot)net> writes:
- > I'm trying to work through a root cause on a performance problem. I'd like to
- > be able to "show" that a problem was fixed by analyzing the table.
-
- > what i've done is
- > set default_statistics_target=1
- > analyze <Table>
-
- > That gets rid of most of the rows in pg_stats, but i'm still getting decent performance.
-
- I usually do something like
-
- DELETE FROM pg_statistic WHERE starelid = 'foo'::regclass;
-
- (you need to be superuser to be allowed to do this).
-
- You may need to keep an eye on whether auto-analyze is coming along and
- undoing what you did, too.
-
- regards, tom lane
-
Awesome, thanks!
Dave
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Kerr | 2012-06-22 18:46:32 | "global/pgstat.stat" corrupt |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-06-22 17:27:51 | Re: Drop statistics? |