Re: initdb and fsync

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: initdb and fsync
Date: 2012-06-19 17:25:40
Message-ID: 201206191925.40486.andres@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 07:22:02 PM Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 21:41 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> > It calls pg_flush_data inside of copy_file which does the
> > posix_fadvise... So maybe just put the sync_file_range in pg_flush_data?
>
> The functions in fd.c aren't linked to initdb, so it's a challenge to
> share that code (I remember now: that's why I didn't use pg_flush_data
> originally). I don't see a clean way to resolve that, do you?
>
> Also, it seems that sync_file_range() doesn't help with creating a
> database much (on my machine), so it doesn't seem important to use it
> there.
>
> Right now I'm inclined to leave the patch as-is.
Fine with that, I wanted to bring it up and see it documented.

I have marked it with ready for committer. That committer needs to decide on -
N in the regression tests or not, but that shouldn't be much of a problem ;)

Cool!

Andres
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex Hunsaker 2012-06-19 17:28:16 Re: pl/perl and utf-8 in sql_ascii databases
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-06-19 17:24:13 Re: [PATCH 10/16] Introduce the concept that wal has a 'origin' node